# Understanding the difference between != and not(=)¶

The two expressions:

`a() != b()`

`not(a() = b())`

look equivalent - so much so that inexperienced (and even experienced) QL programmers have been known to rewrite one as the other. However, they are not equivalent due to the quantifiers involved.

Thinking of `a()`

and `b()`

as sets of values, the first expression says that there is a pair of values (one from each side of the inequality) which are different.

**Using !=**

```
exists x, y | x in a() and y in b() | x != y
```

The second expression, however, says that it is *not* the case that there is a pair of values which are the *same* - that is, *all* pairs of values are different:

**Using not(=)**

```
not exists x, y | x in a() and y in b() | x = y
```

This is equivalent to: `forall x, y | x in a() and y in b() | x != y`

. The meaning is very different from the first expression.

## Examples¶

`a() = {1, 2}`

and `b() = {1}`

:

`a() != b()`

is true, because`2 != 1`

`a() = b()`

is true, because`1 = 1`

- Therefore
`: not(a() = b())`

is false - a different answer from the comparison`a() != b()`

Similarly with `a() = {}`

and `b() = {1}`

:

`a() != b()`

is false, because there is no value in`a()`

that is not equal to`1`

`a() = b()`

is also false, because there is no value in`a()`

that is equal to`1`

either- Therefore:
`not(a() = b())`

is true - again a different answer from the comparison`a() != b()`

In summary, the QL expressions `a() != b()`

and `not(a() = b())`

may look similar, but their meaning is quite different.